ARPHA Conference Abstracts :
Conference Abstract
|
Corresponding author: Marina Tumolo (marina.tumolo@ba.irsa.cnr.it)
Received: 22 Feb 2021 | Published: 04 Mar 2021
© 2021 Marina Tumolo, Valeria Ancona, Daniela Losacco, Vito Uricchio, Domenico De Paola
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Citation:
Tumolo M, Ancona V, Losacco D, Uricchio VF, De Paola D (2021) Optimized protocol proposal to extract eDNA from oligotrophic and degraded water samples. ARPHA Conference Abstracts 4: e64814. https://doi.org/10.3897/aca.4.e64814
|
|
Aquifer represents an oligotrophic environment that sustains a relatively small amount of microbial cells, mostly non-culturable. Due to this dominance of unculturable microorganisms in natural ecosystems, studying microbial communities and their functionality should include culture-independent approaches based on molecular techniques using DNA analysis (
In this work, environmental DNA (eDNA) was extracted from groundwater samples, filtering three different initial volumes (1000 ml, 500 ml, and 250 ml) of water samples, using 0.22 µm membranes. Also, two DNA extraction commercial kits were tested, DNeasy PowerWater Kit and DNeasy PowerSoil kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD) specific for water samples and solid matrix, respectively.
For DNeasy PowerWater Kit the standard protocol was carried out, whereas a modified protocol equipped with the Inhibitor Removal Technology® (IRT) was selected for testing DNeasy PowerSoil kit. In order to minimize operator bias, both the protocols were made semi-automated by using a QIAcube provided by Qiagen for genomic DNA extraction. Additional steps to the PowerSoil IRT protocol were performed for optimizing chemical and mechanical cell lysis processes and facilitating the sample dispersion into the buffer solutions. eDNA was verified via electrophoresis and quantified fluorometrically. eDNA extracted from 250 ml of groundwater sample using the DNeasy PowerSoil kit with modified IRT protocol was also tested in downstream applications, including Polymerase Chain Reactions (PCRs) with specific primer pairs for the identification of microbial targets.
Results suggest that the PowerSoil modified IRT protocol was the best performing one, allowing a higher eDNA yield from all the water sample volumes tested. In addition, plotting on a graph eDNA concentration values against sample volumes filtered, the yield of PowerSoil modified IRT protocol appeared more similar to an ideal direct proportionality than the yield of PowerWater standard protocol. eDNA quality was suitable for PCR analyses and the identification of bacterial targets, including bacterial subgroups (α and β-proteobacteria) and single species of interest, such as Shewanella oneidensis capable of hexavalent chromium reduction (
Downstream applications of eDNA obtained using DNeasy PowerSoil kit resulted in positive outcomes for both the experiments previously described. In light of this, it is possible to conclude that this kit combined with the protocol adjustments proposed in this work, can be a performing tool for eDNA extraction, also from small amounts of water sample collected from oligotrophic or degraded environments.
Further investigations will be oriented to optimize eDNA extraction from the aquifer solid portion characterized by few nutrients and microbial cells to better understand how microbial populations can distribute themselves between solid and aqueous phases.
eDNA, extraction, protocol, aquifer, groundwater, oligotrophic environment
Marina Tumolo
1st DNAQUA International Conference (March 9-11, 2021)
Conceptualization, M.T. and D.D.P.; Writing—original draft preparation, M.T., D.D.P., V.A., D.L.; Writing—review and editing, M.T., D.D.P., and V.A.; Providing case and idea: D.D.P., M.T., V.A. and V.F.U.; supervision: D.D.P, V.A. and V.F.U.; References collection: M.T., D.D.P., D.L., and V.A. All authorshave read and agreed to the published version of the abstract.
The authors declare no conflict of interest.